Citation: | WANG Fu-wei, WANG Zi-li. Value Type and its Evaluation of Forest Resource Asset[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 83-86. |
[1] | XIE Zhe-gen, HE Bi-ting, TONG Hong-wei, HAN Guo-kang, LIU Mei-juan. A Research on the Composition of Forest Resources Assets Value Based on Stand Level[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 61-66. |
[2] | YANG Zhi-geng, ZHANG Ying. Value Evaluation of Jinggangshan Forest Recreation Resources Based on Contingent Value Method[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 53-58. |
[3] | SHI De-qun, ZHANG Yu-jun, . Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 75-80. |
[4] | SHI De-qun, ZHANG Yu-jun. Application of Travel Cost Method in Recreation Value Evaluation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 69-74. |
[5] | ZHOU Wei, ZHAO Xiao-dong, LI Xu, YANG Jin-yu. Evaluation Index System of Wetland Ecotourism Management: Taking Four International Plateau Wetlands in Yunnan Province for Examples[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 63-68. |
[6] | HAN Song, LIU Jun-chang. Review on Research of Evaluation on Wildlife Resource Value[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2008, 7(1): 47-52. |
[7] | GAO Shuang-lin, WANG Guo-zhu. Index System and Evaluation Methods of the Establishment of Subjects[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(4): 65-69. |
[8] | WEI Min, LI Shu-shan. On the Evaluating and Pricing of Scenic Resources[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(2): 32-36. |
[9] | SU Zu-rong. The Stages and Evaluation of Forest Culture Development[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(1): 1-7. |
[10] | Sun Yueqin. Pondering over the Evaluation of Sci-tech Achievements in Agriculture and Forestry[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(3): 55-59. |