Advanced search
MA Zhi-bo, HUANG Qing-lin, MA Hwan OK. Logistic Modeling Analysis on Compensation for Ecosystem Servicesof Natural Commercial Forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(1): 63-68.
Citation: MA Zhi-bo, HUANG Qing-lin, MA Hwan OK. Logistic Modeling Analysis on Compensation for Ecosystem Servicesof Natural Commercial Forest[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(1): 63-68.

Logistic Modeling Analysis on Compensation for Ecosystem Servicesof Natural Commercial Forest

More Information
  • Published Date: March 29, 2012
  • This paper analyzes the reasons that causing difficulty of farmers’ operating right and benefit right could not be ensured although they gained the using rights of Natural Commercial Forest from the Reform of Collective Forest Using Rights System (RCFURS) in south China recently. A policy suggestion is raised that compensation for ecological benefit can resolve the contradictions between public ecology benefit and farmers’ economic benefit. With a logistic regression model, the paper analyzes investigation data of demonstration area, Dagan village of Hainan Province, based on contingent valuation method. Results show that there exists the negative correlation between the probability that farmers accept the payments for ecological services (PES) according to the local standard of public welfare forest compensation and proportion of planting income to family income. The model prediction accuracy is 67.9%. Reducing farmers’ dependence of planting is helpful to implement the PES policy of natural commercial forest, and can protect natural forest resources and achieve sustainable development of local environment and economy.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Liu Liang. The Process of Establishing Ecological Engineering Theory and Difference in Historical Narrations About It[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(2): 27-32. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021074
    [2]LI Si-yu, WU Hong-mei. Sustainability of the Log Trade Based on Ecological Information Approach[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 69-75. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019069
    [3]FENG Li-jie. The Paranoid Feature of Modernity Ecological Civilization's Internal Development Logic in Dialectic of Enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 1-6.
    [4]LI Cong-hui, SONG Jian-feng, JIANG Zhi-de, XIE Yong-sheng. Compensatory Standard of Ecological Water Transmission Control in Water Source Areas:Taking Northeast Ditch Basin for Example[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(3): 99-104.
    [5]WANG Guang-xin. Ecological Consciousness, Ecological Sub-consciousness and Ecological Consumption[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2011, 10(1): 50-53.
    [6]GAO Jian-zhong. Ecological Thinking and Ecological Democracy[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(1): 118-122.
    [7]BI Hua-xing, GUO Chao-ying, LIN Jing-jing. Ethical Foundation of Ecological Compensation for Soil and Water Conservation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2008, 7(3): 29-32.
    [8]HAN Ye. Ecology Ethic and Establishment of Ecology Creative System[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(3): 45-48.
    [9]HUANG Hui, HAN Xing-rong, XIA Zi-qian. A Fundamental Study on Computerization Metadata Standards of China’s Forestry Ecological Engineering Project[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(1): 64-68.
    [10]BAO Qing-de. On Ecological Existence and Ecological Ideology[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(1): 8-12.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(13)

    1. 宋泳辉,陈小马. 水利工程中堤岸滩涂生态修复施工技术探讨. 工程建设与设计. 2022(12): 177-179 .
    2. 赵振忠. 生态护堤工程稳定性分析评价. 陕西水利. 2020(10): 66-68 .
    3. 李长存. 综合生态连通度对城市水系生态格局评价探析. 水利技术监督. 2019(04): 179-182 .
    4. 郦宇琦,王春连. 基于燕尾洲生态护堤模式的金华江流域防洪效应研究. 生态学报. 2019(16): 5955-5966 .
    5. 陈晗. 活树桩-堆石体在生态护岸中工作机制研究. 江西水利科技. 2018(02): 96-99 .
    6. 马劭磊. 探析滨河城市堤岸空间的景观优化设计. 现代园艺. 2017(09): 127-128 .
    7. 郭观明. 深圳坪山河干流堤岸设计与稳定性分析. 人民长江. 2016(S1): 110-113 .
    8. 龙梅珍,唐波. 城市生态驳岸设计研究. 现代园艺. 2014(17): 93-95 .
    9. 吴睿珊,章家恩,梁开明,赵本良,叶延琼,陈丽丽. 生态堤岸的构建设计及其生态服务功能评价探讨. 生态科学. 2014(01): 173-181 .
    10. 赵本良,章家恩,梁开明,孔旭晖,叶延琼,苏贻娟. 广州市典型河涌生态堤岸的调查分析及改进对策. 生态科学. 2014(02): 390-395 .
    11. 闫晶. 广东江门市滨江新区“云水园”规划设计思路分析. 中国园艺文摘. 2014(05): 107-109+136 .
    12. 关瑞华,吕永雄. 广州国际生物岛生态型堤岸工程建设. 广东科技. 2012(13): 233-234+238 .
    13. 马国青,黄桂林,张玉钧,唐小平. 郑州惠济区水系廊道景观优化模式. 林业资源管理. 2012(04): 108-112 .

    Other cited types(16)

Catalog

    Article views (1745) PDF downloads (1) Cited by(29)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return