Natural Protected Area: National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in USA as a Case

LI Peng; ZHANG Duan; ZHAO Min; DAI Xiang-qian

doi:10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018195

Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science) > 2019 > 18(1): 60-69. > DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018195

LI Peng, ZHANG Duan, ZHAO Min, DAI Xiang-qian. Natural Protected Area: National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in USA as a Case[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(1): 60-69. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018195

Citation:

Natural Protected Area: National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in USA as a Case

1.
School of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, P.R. China
2.
Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Missoula, 59801, USA
3.
School of Architectureand Urban Planning, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, P.R. China
4.
Development Research Center, the Ministry of Water Resources, Beijing, 100038, P.R. China

More Information

Received Date: November 19, 2018
Published Date: February 28, 2019

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Governance of natural protected area is one of the key points in ecological civilization building, and government-dominant governance is the main mode of managing natural protected area. National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS) of the United States of America is the earliest river protected system in the world, and its governance mode is the representative of the river protection. On the basis of the framework of the protected area management system, using in-depth interview and comparison, we explored the governance mode of NWSRS. The results show: the governance mode of NWSRS has obvious centralization characteristics in three aspects of legal system, institutional governance and property rights, and also has decentralization characteristics in terms of resource ownership, governance subject and financial support. Its governance is a non-fully federal government governance mode. Those, established and managed by river, respecting rights and moderately decentralizing, maintaining large patterns and changing details, are the innovation of a fully centralized governance mode represented by National Parks System. China's governance on protected areas adopts a "sub-sector governance" mode, which is quite different from the "multi-sector governance" mode of non-fully federal government governance mode. Drawing lessons from WSRS's incomplete centralized governance mode, we can provide references for Chinese Natural Protected Land System in terms of selecting governance types, respecting rights, changing responsibilities and so on.

FullText(HTML)

References (41)

References

[1]	ORRINI-FEYERABEND G, DUDLEY N, JAEGER T, et al. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action (best practice protected area guidelines series No. 20)[M]. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN, 2012.
[2]	曾彩琳.我国自然保护地居民权利保障法律制度研究[J].大连理工大学学报:社会科学版, 2012, 33(3): 122-126. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dllgdxxb-shkxb201203023
[3]	欧阳志云, 徐卫华.整合我国自然保护区体系, 依法建设国家公园[J].生物多样性, 2014, 22(4): 425-426. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/swdyx201404005
[4]	唐小平.中国国家公园体制及发展思路探析[J].生物多样性, 2014, 22(4): 427-430. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/swdyx201404006
[5]	王佳鑫, 石金莲, 常青, 等.基于国际经验的中国国家公园定位研究及其启示[J].世界林业研究, 2016, 29(3): 52-58. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sjlyyj201603010
[6]	周睿, 钟林生, 刘家明, 等.中国国家公园体系构建方法研究——以自然保护区为例[J].资源科学, 2016, 38(4):577-587. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zykx201604001
[7]	吴健, 胡蕾, 高壮.国家公园——从保护地"管理"走向"治理"[J].环境保护, 2017(19): 30-33. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10269-2010197432.htm
[8]	杨桂华, 钟林生, 明庆忠.生态旅游[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000.
[9]	李鹏.国家公园中央治理模式的"国""民"性[J].旅游学刊, 2015, 30(5): 5-7. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=lyxk201505003
[10]	卢琦, 赖政华, 李向东.世界国家公园的回顾与展望[J].世界林业研究, 1995, 8(1): 34-40. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SJLY501.005.htm
[11]	张朝枝, 保继刚, 徐红罡.旅游发展与遗产管理研究:公共选择与制度分析的视角--遗产资源管理研究评述[J].旅游学刊, 2004, 19(5): 35-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2004.05.012
[12]	陈英瑾.英国国家公园与法国区域公园的保护与管理[J].中国园林, 2011, 27(6): 61-65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2011.06.016
[13]	PALMER T. Wild and scenic rivers of America[M]. New York:Island Press, 1993.
[14]	杨锐.美国国家公园体系的发展历程及其经验教训[J].中国园林, 2001, 17(1): 62-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2001.01.019
[15]	LEVERINGTON F, COSTA K L, PAVESE H, et al. A global analysis of protected area management effectiveness[J]. Environmental Management, 2010, 46(5): 685-698. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9564-5
[16]	MASOZERA M K, JANAKIR, ALAVALAPATI R. Forest dependency and its implications for protected areas management: a case study from the Nyungwe Forest Reserve, Rwanda[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 19(S4): 85-92.
[17]	PALOMO I, MARTÍN-LÓPEZ B, LÓPEZ-SANTIAGO C, et al. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain[J]. Ecology and Society, 2011, 16(1): 23. doi: 10.5751/ES-03862-160123
[18]	李如生.美国国家公园管理体制[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2005.
[19]	WARNER R. A comparison of ideas in the development and governance of national parks and protected areas in the US and Canada[J]. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 2008(37): 13-39. doi: 10.7202/040793ar
[20]	高科.公益性、制度化与科学管理:美国国家公园管理的历史经验[J].旅游学刊, 2015, 30(5): 3-5. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyxk201505002
[21]	徐菲菲, FOX D.英美国家公园体制比较及启示[J].旅游学刊, 2015, 30(6): 5-8. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyxk201506003
[22]	Management Bureau of Land. Bureau of land management policy and program direction for identification, evaluation, planning and management of wild & scenic rivers[EB/OL].[2018-07-13].https://www.rivers.gov/documents/blm-policy-manual.pdf.
[23]	Council Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating. Implementing the Wild & Scenic Rivers Act: authorities and roles of key federal agencies[EB/OL].[2018-03-28].https://www.rivers.gov/documents/federal-agency-roles.pdf.
[24]	Council Technical Report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers. Wild & scenic river management responsibilities[EB/OL].[2016-05-26]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/management.pdf.
[25]	Council Technical Report of the Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers. Wild & scenic river table[EB/OL].[2018-08-03] https://www.rivers.gov/documents/rivers-table.pdf.
[26]	Service Congressional Research. The wild and scenic rivers act and federal water rights[EB/OL].[2018-02-14]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/crs-water-rights-2008.pdf.
[27]	Council Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating. Protecting resource values on non-federal lands[EB/OL].[2018-05-25]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/non-federal-lands-protection.pdf.
[28]	Comprehensive River Management Plan. Clarks fork of the Yellowstone comprehensive river management plan[EB/OL].[2018-11-16]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/plans/clarks-fork-plan.pdf.
[29]	Council Interagency Wild and Scenic Rivers Coordinating. Evolution of the wild and scenic rivers act: a history of substantive amendments 1968-2013[EB/OL].[2016-05-25]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/wsr-act-evolution.pdf.
[30]	USA Forest Service. Get this from a library river management analysis: national wild and scenic river systems : Skagit and Snohomish Counties, Washington[EB/OL].[2016-06-17]. http://www.worldcat.org/title/river-management-analysis-national-wild-and-scenic-river-systems-skagit-and-snohomish-counties-washington/oclc/369510765.
[31]	USA Forest Service. Wild and scenic rivers and the use of Eminent Domain[EB/OL].[2016-05-25]. https://www.rivers.gov/documents/eminent-domain.pdf, 1998, 12.
[32]	CONNELL D. Water politics in the Murray-Darling Basin[M]. Alexandria: Federation Press, 2007.
[33]	龙笛, 潘巍.河流保护与生态修复[J].水利水电科技进展, 2006, 26(2): 21-25. doi: 10.3880/j.issn.1006-7647.2006.02.006
[34]	VANNOTE R L, MINSHALL G W, CUMMINS K W, et al. The river continuum concept[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1980, 37(1): 130-137. doi: 10.1139/f80-017
[35]	魏晓华, 孙阁.流域生态系统过程与管理[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2009.
[36]	HAYES T M. Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas[J]. World Development, 2006, 34(12): 2064-2075. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.03.002
[37]	WEBER M. Wirtschaft und gesellschaft: grundriss der verstehenden soziologie[M]. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2002.
[38]	Congressional Research Service. Federal land ownership: overview and data[EB/OL].[2017-06-25]. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42346.pdf. 2017.
[39]	李鹏, 张端, 戴向前, 等.美国荒野风景河流体系发展阶段及其主要影响因素[J].南水北调与水利科技, 2018, 16(99): 182-190. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nsbdyslkj201806026
[40]	Board Canadian Heritage Rivers. The canadian heritage rivers system charter[EB/OL].[2016-01-29]. http://chrs.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/chrschartergraphic_englishfinalweb.pdf.
[41]	STEIN J L, STEIN J A, NIX H A. Wild rivers in Australia[J]. International Journal of Wilderness, 2001, 7(1): 20-24.

Cited By

Get Citation

XML

Article views (1771) PDF downloads (49)

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Natural Protected Area: National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in USA as a Case

Abstract

References

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content