Advanced search
Deng Jing, Guo Lisha, Tian Zhiwei. Performance Evaluation of China Forestry Insurance Subsidy and Measurement of the Optimal Subsidy Scale[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 43-49. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021342
Citation: Deng Jing, Guo Lisha, Tian Zhiwei. Performance Evaluation of China Forestry Insurance Subsidy and Measurement of the Optimal Subsidy Scale[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(4): 43-49. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021342

Performance Evaluation of China Forestry Insurance Subsidy and Measurement of the Optimal Subsidy Scale

More Information
  • Received Date: December 01, 2021
  • Available Online: September 29, 2022
  • Published Date: December 29, 2022
  • Based on the theory related to the efficiency of fiscal expenditure, the efficiency of forest insurance financial subsidies in China was studied. Firstly, the comprehensive efficiency evaluation index system of my country's forest insurance financial subsidies is constructed from the perspectives of economic efficiency and social efficiency, and the entropy weighting method was used to measure the subsidy efficiency values by province for 2019. Then, incorporating the scale of subsidies into the production function, the data of each province in China from 2013-2019 were used to explore the impact of different factors on the efficiency of financial subsidies for forest insurance and to measure the optimal scale of forest insurance subsidies in China. It is found that economic efficiency is given more weight than social efficiency in evaluating the efficiency of financial subsidies for forest insurance; the scale of government financial subsidies has a significant positive driving effect on the efficiency of subsidies, while the level of economic development of the place also has an important impact on the efficiency of forest insurance financial subsidies; In addition, the production function method shows that the subsidy efficiency is maximized when the government forest insurance premium subsidy reaches 4.21% of the primary forestry industry output, but the actual scale of subsidies in most regions of the country is still far smaller than the optimal level. Based on the above findings, this paper proposes the following recommendations: to expand the scope of subsidies and implement forest insurance nationwide; to increase the financial subsidies, strive to narrow the difference with the optimal scale, and increase the subsidy ratio differently according to the actual situation of the economic development level and the amount of subsidies in each region; to pay attention to the improvement of economic efficiency while taking into account social efficiency; the government should comprehensively determine the optimal subsidy scale of forest insurance according to the target scale of forestry output value and the optimal subsidy scale ratio.
  • [1]
    秦涛,吴今,邓晶,等. 我国森林保险保费构成机制与财政补贴方式选择[J]. 东南学术,2016(4):101-110. doi: 10.13658/j.cnki.sar.2016.04.014
    [2]
    王天会. 浙江省森林保险现状及困境研究[J]. 林业经济问题,2017,37(6):62-65,107. doi: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.2017.06.011
    [3]
    秦涛,顾雪松,李佳怡,等. 森林保险财政补贴政策文献评述与研究展望[J]. 农林经济管理学报,2017,16(3):310-315. doi: 10.16195/j.cnki.cn36-1328/f.2017.03.6
    [4]
    QIN T,DENG J,PAN H,et al. The effect of coverage level and premium subsidy on farmers' participation in forest insurance:an empirical analysis of forest owners in Hunan Province of China[J]. Journal of Sustainable Forestry,2016,35(3):191-204. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2016.1140060
    [5]
    QIN T,GU X,TIAN Z,et al. An empirical analysis of the factors influencing farmer demand for forest insurance:based on surveys from Lin'an County in Zhejiang Province of China[J]. Journal of Forest Economics,2016,24:37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2016.04.001
    [6]
    SAUTER P A,MÖLLMANN T B,ANASTASSIADIS F,et al. To insure or not to insure? Analysis of foresters' willingness-to-pay for fire and storm insurance[J]. Forest Policy Economics,2016,73:78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.08.005
    [7]
    邓晶,陈启博. 基于DEA模型的我国森林保险保费补贴效率研究[J]. 林业经济,2018,40(10):88-95,112. doi: 10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.10.016
    [8]
    KE S F,CHEN Z C,ROBSON M,et al. Evaluating the implementation efficiency of the Natural Forest Protection Program in ten provinces of western China by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)[J]. The International Forestry Review,2015,17(4):469-476. doi: 10.1505/146554815817476413
    [9]
    WANKE P,BARROS C P. Efficiency drivers in Brazilian insurance:a two-stage DEA meta frontier-data mining approach[J]. Economic Modelling,2016,53:8-22. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.005
    [10]
    李彧挥,王会超,陈诚,等. 政策性森林保险补贴效率分析−基于湖南、福建、江西三省调研数据实证研究[J]. 经济问题探索,2012(7):17-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2912.2012.07.004
    [11]
    秦涛,田治威,潘焕学. 我国森林保险保费补贴政策执行效果、存在的主要问题与建议[J]. 经济纵横,2017(1):105-110. doi: 10.16528/j.cnki.22-1054/f.201701105
    [12]
    富丽莎,秦涛,潘焕学,等. 森林保险保费补贴政策的林业产出规模效应实证分析−基于双重差分模型与事件研究模型[J]. 浙江农业学报,2021,33(2):355-368. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2021.02.19
    [13]
    李亚军. 基于保险费率、购买意愿和补贴效益的森林保险业发展与对策研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2014.
    [14]
    郑彬,高岚. 森林保险保费补贴效率测评−基于SE-DEA模型与Malmquist指数[J]. 资源开发与市场,2019,35(1):7-12. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2019.01.002
    [15]
    杜伟岸,李欣然. 中部地区政策性农业保险财政补贴绩效评价−基于DEA模型[J]. 财会通讯,2016(13):20-23,4. doi: 10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2016.13.007
    [16]
    张祖荣. 我国农业保险保费补贴资金使用效果评价:方法与证据[J]. 财政研究,2017(8):101-111. doi: 10.19477/j.cnki.11-1077/f.2017.08.009
    [17]
    郑军,杜佳欣. 农业保险的精准扶贫效率:基于三阶段DEA模型[J]. 贵州财经大学学报,2019(1):93-102.
    [18]
    王银梅,刘丹丹. 我国财政农业支出效率评价[J]. 农业经济问题,2015,36(8):49-55,111. doi: 10.13246/j.cnki.iae.2015.08.008
    [19]
    张伟,易沛,徐静,等. 政策性农业保险对粮食产出的激励效应[J]. 保险研究,2019(1):32-44. doi: 10.13497/j.cnki.is.2019.01.003
    [20]
    顾严. 我国财政支出对宏观经济的影响−基于“巴罗法则”的视角[J]. 中央财经大学学报,2006(11):1-5. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1549.2006.11.001
    [21]
    王晓红. 精准扶贫视角下提升我国农业保险财政补贴效率研究[J]. 理论探讨,2020(1):102-107. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8594.2020.01.017
    [22]
    郑军,朱甜甜. 经济效率和社会效率:农业保险财政补贴综合评价[J]. 金融经济学研究,2014,29(3):88-97.

Catalog

    Article views (473) PDF downloads (25) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return