Citation: | XIAN Feng, XU Zheng-chun. Consideration of State-owned Forest Farms' Reform and Development in Guangdong Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2007, 6(3): 74-78. |
[1] | WU Xiao, CHEN Shao-zhi, ZHAO Rong. Issues in the Early Stage of Reforming State-owned Forest Farms in Sichuan Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2017, 16(3): 56-60. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016096 |
[2] | HE Chao, JIANG Bing-run. Case Study on Denationalization Operating Model of State-owned Forest Farms[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(2): 78-81. |
[3] | HU Rui, SONG Wei-ming. Research on Management Models of Plantation and Its Reference[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 91-95. |
[4] | WANG Jing, SHEN Yue-qin. Research Review on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Its Market[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(2): 82-87. |
[5] | SHI Feng, YU Ying, XIANG Yan, . Strategic Thoughts about Deepening the Reform of State-owned Forest Areas[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 97-101. |
[6] | TIAN Ming-hua. Study on the Classified Management Reform of State-owned Forest Farms in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(4): 5-11. |
[7] | ZENG Hua-feng, NIE Ying, . Forest Land Transactions: Necessity and Measures to Control Market Weakness[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(3): 120-125. |
[8] | TIAN Ming-hua, WANG Zi-li, LI Hong-xun. The System Reform of Stateowned Forest Farms in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2008, 7(4): 54-59. |
[9] | WEI Jie-gen, XU Zhi-gang, XU Jin-tao. Labor Market Development, Land Tenure Reform and Deforestation in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2005, 4(2): 44-50. |
[10] | Chu Wanglin, Liu Junchang. On the Reform of Rural Finance System in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2004, 3(4): 62-65. |