Advanced search
LIANG Ping, ZHANG Yin. The Types of Interpretive Audiences and Their Demands Based on the Use of Interpretation:A Case Study on Beijing Botanical Garden[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(1): 46-50. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015095
Citation: LIANG Ping, ZHANG Yin. The Types of Interpretive Audiences and Their Demands Based on the Use of Interpretation:A Case Study on Beijing Botanical Garden[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(1): 46-50. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2015095

The Types of Interpretive Audiences and Their Demands Based on the Use of Interpretation:A Case Study on Beijing Botanical Garden

More Information
  • Published Date: March 16, 2016
  • The research on interpretive demand is the basis of building and optimizing the interpretive systems in tourist attractions. Studying interpretive demands from the point of interpretive audiences爷 demands for the optimization of interpretive systems would be more effectively communicate environmental knowledge to them, therefore inspiring them to respect nature, comply with nature and protect nature. Adopting questionnaire survey, the study made an analysis of the types of interpretive audiences and their interpretive demands in Beijing Botanical Garden. Regarding the types of interpretive audiences, there are 4 types of interpretive audiences according to the definition by Stewart in 1998, i. e. , they are Seekers, Stumblers, Shadowers and Shunners. After surveying in Beijing Botanical Garden, about 1/2 of them were Seekers, and approximate 1/3 of them were Stumblers, and the proportion of Shadowers and Shunners was the smallest. Concurrently, the interpretive demands and differential demands from different interpretive audiences in Beijing Botanical Garden were systematically studied from 3 aspects of interpretive media, interpretive contents and interpretive activities. Finally, combing the current situation of interpretive demands from different types of audiences and the interpretive system in Beijing Botanical Garden, the targeted suggestions about optimizing the interpretive system are put forward.
  • Related Articles

    [1]YAN Ge, CUI Cai-xian, CHANG Zhen-shan. Policy Interpretation and Path of Return of Healthy Development of Forest Town: A Case Study of Wugong Forest Town in Xianyang City[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2020, 19(3): 49-54. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2020068
    [2]SHANG Qin-qin, YANG Jin-na, ZHANG Yu-jun. Interpretation System Satisfaction of Nanhaizi Country Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(3): 40-47. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018017
    [3]ZHANG Qi, WU En. Discussion on the Optimization of Interpretation Signs of the Palace Museum from the Perspective of Experience[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(2): 64-69. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2017083
    [4]XIN Yong-quan. Brand Vitality of Green Activities by the Communist Youth League in Beijing Forestry University[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 89-93.
    [5]WU Shu-ling. Cultural Interpretation of Historical and Cultural Greenway: A Case Study on the Landscape Design of the Old Railway in Xiamen of Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 27-31.
    [6]CHEN Shi-qing, CHEN Li-li, WANG Xin, WU Jia-liang. The Main Forms and Inspirations of Environmental Interpretation of Country Parks in Hong Kong[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(2): 46-51.
    [7]YAN Jing-juan. Meaning-attribution and Strained Interpretation: Formation of Plant's Cultural Meaning[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(3): 19-23.
    [8]LI Fei, YAN Geng. Forest Utilization in Shushu(术数) Activities and Its Cultural Interpretation[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(3): 26-30.
    [9]MA Bao-jian, ZHANG Yin. Connotation of Natural Tourism and Its Inspiration to the Interpretation of Scenic Spot: Taking Wulingyuan Scenic Spot, Zhangjiajie City as a Case[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2009, 8(2): 33-35.
    [10]LI Ming-yang, CUI Zhi-hua, SHEN Shi-guang, XI Qing. Research on Quantitative Model of Aesthetic Evaluation of Scenic Forests and Suitability of Recreational Activities in Zijin Mountain,Nanjing City[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2008, 7(3): 6-11.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(2)

    1. 柯祯,刘敏. 旅游解说研究进展与差异分析. 旅游学刊. 2019(02): 120-136 .
    2. 张德顺,王伟霞,刘红权,刘鸣,宋奎银. 植物园规划创新模式探索. 风景园林. 2016(12): 113-120 .

    Other cited types(8)

Catalog

    Article views (731) PDF downloads (132) Cited by(10)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return