Nominalization and the Construction of Power
Published Date:
September 29, 2010
Abstract
Nominalization is rarely discussed in critical discourse analysis. Based on the theory of systemic-functional linguistics, this paper explored the definition and classification of nominalization, its effect of thingness, abstraction, condensation and fuzziness, the nominalization of modality, appraisal meaning, and the omission of mood, as well as the textual function of nominalization in relation to their role in power construction. The study shows that nominalization can be employed by the addresser to construct specific ideational, interpersonal and textual meanings according to his/her own intention, control the construing of the world by the text, and manipulate the addressees interpretation of the text, so as to construct advantageous power relations.
References
Related Articles
[1] Yang Chao, Liu Xi, Song Weiming, Huang Hongwei. Export Potential of China's Wood Forest Products under the Background of Dual Circulation Development Pattern [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021252
[2] ZHANG Hui, HU Ming-xing. Trade Potential of China’s Importation of Woody Forest Products from Countries along the “Belt and Road” [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2019, 18(4): 62-68. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2019066
[3] LI Tian-yu, HOU Fang-miao. Impact of the Opening of the New Suez Canal on the China-EU's Forest Products Trade Potential Under the Background of Belt and Road Initiative [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(3): 63-68. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018011
[4] YU Dan, ZHANG Lan, ZHANG Cai-hong. Evaluation on Regional Development Potential of Forest Biomass Energy Based on TOPSIS Method [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2016, 15(3): 50-55. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2016007
[5] CAI Fei, WANG Jing, SHI Jian-jun, ZHANG Cai-hong. Potential of Biomass Energy Based on Agricultural Wastes and Forestry Residues in Henan Province [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(2): 54-57.
[6] CAI Fei, ZHANG Lan, ZHANG Cai-hong. Potential of Woody Biomass Energy and Its Availability in China [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 103-107.
[7] DU Wen-jing, MIAO Dong-ling. Trade Potential of Export Areas of Wood-based Panel in China [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(1): 69-73.
[8] HAN Ai-gui, KE Shui-fa, ZHENG Yan. Impact of Tourism Industry of Forest Parks on Employment [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(4): 59-64.
[9] YANG Hai-jiao. Chinese Traditional Forestry Culture and Sustainable Development of Forestry [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2007, 6(1): 16-19.
[10] XU Yan, ZHANG Cai_hong. Research on Financing Channels for China’s Forestry Sustainable Development [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2006, 5(1): 59-63.
Cited by Periodical cited type(13)
1.
刘思远，潘剑，单明，刘彦青，姜婷婷，杨旭东. 双碳目标下中国生物质资源定量评估及能源替代研究. 环境生态学. 2024(11): 37-42+126 .
2.
梁康哲，唐杰，王全亮. 林木剩余物热成型温度场分布与压头优化研究. 森林工程. 2023(06): 116-125 .
3.
赵程乐，孟贵，吴水荣，张超，刘叶菲. 我国林业生物质能源产业发展与政策演进分析. 林业资源管理. 2022(01): 1-7 .
4.
张剑超，白洁. 生态文明视域下我国木材资源可持续发展方向初探. 林产工业. 2021(12): 115-117 .
5.
张岳琦，廖翠萍，谢鹏程，吴佳欢，赵黛青. 广东省生物质发电应用的影响因素分析. 新能源进展. 2020(06): 524-532 .
6.
冯雪，吴国春，曹玉昆，张滨，郭思源. 生物质能源可利用潜力评价——以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例. 中国农业资源与区划. 2019(06): 55-62 .
7.
潘勇，夏坤能，李大志，毛琨. 延边州可利用农林生物质能资源现状调查与评价. 湖北林业科技. 2018(02): 4-7 .
8.
冯雪，吴国春，曹玉昆. 基于Citespace的中国生物质能源研究知识图谱分析. 干旱区资源与环境. 2018(01): 35-42 .
9.
任继勤，李梦柔，马艺丹. 基于PEST分析的京郊落叶处理方式研究. 天津农业科学. 2018(09): 77-80 .
10.
于丹，张兰，张彩虹. 基于熵权TOPSIS的林木生物质能源区域发展潜力的评价研究. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版). 2016(03): 50-55 .
11.
罗宝华，张彩虹，牛志蕾. 基于ISM的沙区生物质发电产业影响因素分析. 林业经济问题. 2016(02): 162-168 .
12.
张卫东，张兰，张彩虹，于丹. 我国林木生物质能源资源分类及总量估算. 北京林业大学学报(社会科学版). 2015(02): 52-55 .
13.
马哲，马中. 基于生物量转换因子的林业剩余物理论资源潜力评估方法与应用. 林业调查规划. 2015(01): 1-8+14 .
Other cited types(19)
DownLoad: