Advanced search
WU Juan, YAO Yao, XING Hong, WU Cheng-liang, CHEN Jian-cheng. Evaluation of Farmer's Satisfaction at Supporting Measures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform:A Case Study in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 78-82.
Citation: WU Juan, YAO Yao, XING Hong, WU Cheng-liang, CHEN Jian-cheng. Evaluation of Farmer's Satisfaction at Supporting Measures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform:A Case Study in Fujian Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(4): 78-82.

Evaluation of Farmer's Satisfaction at Supporting Measures of Collective Forest Tenure Reform:A Case Study in Fujian Province

More Information
  • Published Date: February 10, 2015
  • Collective forest tenure reform is conducive to increase farmers' income and raise their great enthusiasm for protecting and managing forest. Supporting measures have played the important role in forest tenure reform. Taking Taining County and Jiangle County in Sanming city, Fujian Province as the research object, we select infrastructure and forestry promotion as the main survey contents. The former one includes environmental sanitation and road construction, while scientific and technical knowledge, market information, pest and disease control, anti-theft logging and forest fire are investigated to make analysis of the effects of forestry promotion. Firstly by descriptive analysis on the survey results, we have a general understanding of farmers' satisfaction at supporting measures. Then we have quantitative evaluation of the overall satisfaction at the supporting measures of collective forest tenure reform by AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The results show that more than half of the farmers are quite satisfied with the supporting measures of collective forest tenure reform, which interprets that farmers are quite satisfied with the supporting measures in our country. However there are still large flaws in the infrastructure building and technology services, and the advices are given for them.
  • Related Articles

    [1]Yi Hongcheng, Pan Huanxue. Social Capital, Policy Satisfaction and Farmers' Contract Signing Behavior in "Shift of Village to Residence"[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2025, 24(1): 58-67. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2024071
    [2]Geng Yunhui, Wang Wukui, Zhang Jingran. Factors Influencing Consumers' Satisfaction with Edible Non-wood Forest Products Based on Online Reviews[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2022, 21(2): 63-70. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2021113
    [3]QIAO Dan, LI Hong-xun, KE Shui-fa, ZHU Lie-fu. Factors Influencing Farmers’ Satisfaction with Forestry Public Services: Based on an Investigation of 293 Households in Huairou District in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(3): 48-55. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018024
    [4]SHANG Qin-qin, YANG Jin-na, ZHANG Yu-jun. Interpretation System Satisfaction of Nanhaizi Country Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(3): 40-47. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2018017
    [5]PENG Qiu-yuan, HUANG Jie-long, XING Xiu-Cheng, WANG Li-qun. Satisfaction Evaluation of Farmers with "Compound Identity" in Urban Afforestation Project:A Survey of Land-Expropriated Peasant Households Based on Afforestation Project in Beijing Plain[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2018, 17(1): 66-72. DOI: 10.13931/j.cnki.bjfuss.2017098
    [6]DAI Hu-xuan, ZONG Cheng, LEE Chun-hong, MA Jian-zhang. Motivation, Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of Environmental Volunteers in Taiwan, China: Cases of Taroko and Yangmingshan National Parks[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2015, 14(2): 34-40.
    [7]TIAN Ming-hua, CAI Xin-yu, WANG Xiao-xue, SUN Yi-wa, WU Xiao-meng, DU Xue-xian, GUAN Yue. Analysis on Participants'Behavior and Satisfaction in Allot Gardens in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2014, 13(1): 83-90.
    [8]WANG Bi, ZHANG Zhi-tao, KE Shui-fa, JIANG Li, ZHANG Xin. Farmers'Cognition, Satisfaction and Demand Willingness on Forestry Science and Technology Service: Based on Survey of 275 Families in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2013, 12(3): 44-48.
    [9]ZI Fei, YANG Zhi-hui, ZHANG Fan, TIAN Hao, WANG Guang-xin, WU Jian-ping, LIU Yang, FANG Gang, XIANG Jin-jing, FANG Ran. Report of Environment Satisfaction and Life Satisfaction in 10 Cities in China[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2012, 11(4): 1-6.
    [10]LI Cui-cui1, XU Cheng-yang1, ZHANG Zhi-du1, GONG Lan1, LI Bo, JIN Gui-xiang, CHEN Shu-hua. Residents’ Satisfaction on Country Parks in Beijing[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 2010, 9(2): 68-72.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 张兵,白祥,杜海旺. 中国集体林权制度改革研究现状及展望. 农业展望. 2020(01): 35-39 .
    2. 邹健健,刘维忠. 基于农户视角的新疆集体林权制度改革成效评价. 林业经济问题. 2018(05): 78-82+110 .
    3. 梁德岩. 林业信息技术的应用及发展趋势. 科技创新导报. 2017(04): 91-92 .
    4. 王进辉. 以生态建设为主体的新林业发展战略构想——以厦门市同安区为例. 安徽农学通报. 2016(07): 98-99 .
    5. 刘晓敏,张云,叶金国. 环首都地区农户集体林权制度改革结果满意度实证分析——以丰宁县为例. 林业经济问题. 2016(01): 9-13 .
    6. 纪凤春,王崇民. 黑龙江省林业产业集群发展对策研究. 林业勘查设计. 2016(02): 9-10 .
    7. 刘卫华. 森林生态资源管理与保护的思考. 农民致富之友. 2015(20): 154 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (617) PDF downloads (184) Cited by(11)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return